EDIT: I started this post months ago, and am only now realizing that I didn’t publish it, somehow.
I was over at Treehugger the other day, and I saw something on their blog roll about how having a smaller house is greener, and anyway do we really need ALL that space? Well, duh.
I can see why Treehugger would have to post that. People don’t really think about it. Americans are trained to get the biggest, most luxurious living space that they can afford. But how much space do people really need to live comfortably? Not only space–how much car does one need, how much food does one need, how much stuff does one need? Could you get by using a little less hand soap and toothpaste, eating a smaller portion for dinner, using a little less electricity, turning the thermostat down or up a bit more?
We’ve gotten used to living comfortable lives, so much so that we have begun to take it for granted. I cringed a bit earlier today; I was cleaning up the kitchen and bathroom, and I probably went through half a roll of paper towels. I don’t think I used more paper towels than were needed to actually do the job; I am not one of those who takes paper towels in a wad and throws them away half-clean. Even so, I used something like half a roll. I prefer to use cloth towels, but all of mine are extremely dirty at the moment–in fact, they’re frequently dirty, in which case I turn to paper towels. They’re a convenience crutch: instead of stocking up on cloth towels that can be reused until they fall apart, I burn through paper towels until it’s laundry time. How many convenience crutches do I have? How many do we have as a people that prevent us from making real environmental progress?
I’m in the second full generation that didn’t experience the Great Depression. (Well, more or less.) My father was born in 1962, my mother was born in 1961, and I was born in 1983; their parents, my grandparents, were very young during the Great Depression, so you might even consider my generation to be almost three generations removed from the Great Depression, as very young children didn’t really have any control over family life and may not have even realized that they were scrimping and saving and restraining themselves. During the Depression, it was essential to save, save, save; you saved as much as you could, whether it was money or food or household product. Everything had much more value; you couldn’t afford to waste anything, and even if you could, you certainly wouldn’t waste anything because everything was valuable.
Since that time, it seems that only certain things have any real ‘value.’ Paper towels, being by nature disposable, have very little value. Being that there is now an abundance of food, it has little value; we eat as much as we want, and then buy overpriced diet food when we eat too much regular food. We consume and toss away the leftovers for someone else to handle. On top of that, we feel entitled to do so based on the amount of money we’re sporting in our bankrolls.
Can we really say that money, even money that we worked hard to earn, entitles us to do whatever we want, regardless of the long-term consequences? Consider emissions and smog. Do we have the right to fill up our low mpg, fuel-guzzling vehicles and drive around, regardless of the fact that we’re emitting greater quantities of poisonous gas into the atmosphere than needed? And please, don’t tell me that carbon emissions from cars aren’t poisonous. If you truly believe that, run a hose from your exhaust pipe to the inside of your car, roll up all the windows, and sit there for a few hours. Fast-forward to the end of this little experiment: you will die. Car exhaust will kill you. Is it right and just that people who can afford to drive cars with horrible gas mileage are allowed to do so, despite the fact that it endangers the people around them? I’ve seen the brown cloud hanging over Los Angeles, and this is after fuel emission standards were put into place. That cloud is a cloud of death for everyone in Los Angeles, from the poorest to the richest; everywhere you find a high concentration of drivers, the emissions are there, whether they are visible or not. Is it fair that people who have worked hard for their money can effectively poison the atmosphere in a whole city?
Death-carrying emissions come from other sources, as well. Consider the electricity that you use, even when you’re not actually using the thing that the electricity is using. If your electricity comes from coal, it’s producing emissions. Consider our landfills. Are we truly at liberty to fill them as we please–it’s not my land, or your land, and the effects of overflowing landfills don’t just affect the landowners. The masses of decomposing garbage create methane at a scale that has not been produced in the arc of human history preceding the modern industrial era.
I could go on and on–our food production, our water use, many areas where non-environmentalists claim that they can consume as they please because they work hard and they can afford to pay for their consumption. What I wonder is, can you really afford to pay for your consumption? Can you afford to feed everyone when our unsustainable farming practices fail? Can you afford to pay hospital bills if someone becomes sick from excessive carbon emissions? Can you afford to fix the problem when we are unable to obtain crude oil and, too late, need to switch to something that we can produce ourselves? The point I’m trying to make is that, regardless of your household income or lifestyle preference, the choices that you make concerning your own personal consumption don’t only affect you. Blathering on about how hard you worked to earn your money is irrelevant, because we don’t live in a nation (supposedly) that allows for the rich to dominate the poor and force them into unsound living conditions. No man is an island, and no family’s consumption habits are disconnected from the problems.
The solution, of course, is downsizing. Perhaps not always downsizing our material possessions (although I am looking at you, SUV and Hummer owners), but downsizing our egos and downsizing our feelings of entitlement. No one person is entitled to ruin it for everyone else, that’s simply how it is. So put those feelings behind you. Turn off the lights when you leave the room. Use the A/C and heat sparingly. Buy a fuel-efficient car. (Fun fact: fuel-efficient cars will also generally last longer than non-fuel-efficient cars.) Ask yourself if you really need to buy those itty-bitty individually wrapped things–no, ask yourself if you should buy them. Think about your choices from conception to production line to post-consumption, and remember that you have a responsibility to others, and others’ children and grandchildren, not to mess it up for the rest of us.


